Featured Video Play Icon

Figures out this week from Boris Johnson MP’s Treasury said that businesses will face costs of £7.5 billion in the face of a no deal Brexit. These aren’t costs associated with new tariffs, these are simply costs from the UK being outside of a Customs Union and new red tape being imposed on business.

I asked the Minister who he expected would have to pay for this £7.5 billion in costs. Would it be the business having to absorb them? Would it be consumers having to pay more for goods? Or would it be employees who lose income or even jobs?

The answer from the Minister showed how much this government is flailing around with no direction or control over the cost of their actions. He said that these costs would be put on all three of the above options.

This is dangerously reckless policies towards businesses. This will mean that formerly profitable businesses will struggle, costs will increase in supply chains and the price at the checkout will rise. This is just another reason why no deal Brexit must be avoided at all costs.

Featured Video Play Icon

A new report was published by the UK Government this week on the impacts on the UK and the UK Government’s preparedness for it.

One section that I found deeply worrying was that on security. In the document it noted that we will lose access to all security protocols in place that keep us safe. Meaning our access to information on criminals would be undermined.

The Minister decided to play the blame game instead of answering my point. What he didn’t tell you was that the UK Government has always been intent on opting out of some of the security measures currently in place because of their ideologically driven red lines. They are undermining our national security and the sooner they realise that Brexit is not an internal Conservative Party game and is a serious policy decision being made for our country the sooner we can have some grown up politics.

By David Hanson MP / Latest News / / 0 Comments
Featured Video Play Icon

Last week a World Trade Organisation (WTO) ruling opened the door on the United States of America imposing tariffs on Airbus and other goods coming from the UK. These tariffs are expected to hit us to the tune of $7.5 billion.

Airbus directly employs around 13,500 jobs and an additional 110,000 jobs are linked via supply chains. The United States use of the WTO to restrict free trade is deeply concerning.

Free trade makes us all better off and these new tariffs will also harm the US. Indeed, Airbus employs (directly and indirectly) 275,000 in the United States. Yet again President Donald Trump has decided to pursue a trade war instead of pursuing wealth for all countries.

I asked the new trade minister what action he has taken. He said he has spoken with the other industries hit by these new tariffs and will be talking with the US Ambassador to the UK. We can’t afford to waste any time if we are to end this trade war. The UK Government need to act quickly and decisively if we are to reinstate free trade for one of the biggest employers in Flintshire.

Featured Video Play Icon

Before Parliament was unlawfully shut down, I voted with my colleagues to ensure the release of the Yellowhammer papers. These papers outlined the impact of a no deal Brexit upon the country.

As you know, my gravest concerns for a no deal Brexit have focused on its impacts upon our security and safety. Leaving without a deal means we lose all the security tools our police and security services use on a daily basis. Things like the European Arrest Warrant – allowing us to track down criminals who have fled the country and bring them back to face justice – EUROPOL – which allows us to share information with police forces across the EU – and SIS 2 – the border monitoring software.

In paragraph 10 of the report, which was drafted by Boris Johnson MP’s government, it notes that we will lose access to all of these and it will put us at risk. I asked the Minister responsible for no deal Brexit, Michael Gove MP, if he had made a risk assessment on this. But more importantly if he thought the risk was worth taking.

The Minister provided no solid response.