A new report was published by the UK Government this week on the impacts on the UK and the UK Government’s preparedness for it.
One section that I found deeply worrying was that on security. In the document it noted that we will lose access to all security protocols in place that keep us safe. Meaning our access to information on criminals would be undermined.
The Minister decided to play the blame game instead of answering my point. What he didn’t tell you was that the UK Government has always been intent on opting out of some of the security measures currently in place because of their ideologically driven red lines. They are undermining our national security and the sooner they realise that Brexit is not an internal Conservative Party game and is a serious policy decision being made for our country the sooner we can have some grown up politics.
Before Parliament was unlawfully shut down, I voted with my colleagues to ensure the release of the Yellowhammer papers. These papers outlined the impact of a no deal Brexit upon the country.
As you know, my gravest concerns for a no deal Brexit have focused on its impacts upon our security and safety. Leaving without a deal means we lose all the security tools our police and security services use on a daily basis. Things like the European Arrest Warrant – allowing us to track down criminals who have fled the country and bring them back to face justice – EUROPOL – which allows us to share information with police forces across the EU – and SIS 2 – the border monitoring software.
In paragraph 10 of the report, which was drafted by Boris Johnson MP’s government, it notes that we will lose access to all of these and it will put us at risk. I asked the Minister responsible for no deal Brexit, Michael Gove MP, if he had made a risk assessment on this. But more importantly if he thought the risk was worth taking.
The Minister provided no solid response.
Following the Prime Minister’s visit to Brussels to take part in the Council of Ministers – the forum where Ministers/Prime Ministers from every elected government meet to set the direction of travel within the EU – she returned to the House of Commons to give a statement on its conclusions. The meeting with primarily focused on security and climate change.
That is why I asked the Prime Minister if she would confirm that leaving the EU in a no deal scenario would mean that we lose access to EUROPOL, EUROJUST, the European Arrest Warrant and SIS 2 – the border security monitoring databases.
As an outgoing Prime Minister I would have hoped for straight talking answers. She has no need to try and defend herself from her backbenches as they have already started selecting their next leader. The Prime Minister should have confirmed that we would lose access to these vital security measures. Instead she focused on internet security. It is time we had a grown up discussion about a no deal Brexit. Something this UK Government will not have.
We had the Director of the Serious Fraud Office in front of the Justice Select Committee today. It was a great opportunity for us to remove the heat out of the Brexit debate and shine some light instead.
The Director was able to state that the loss of tools we currently have at our disposal will slow down our processes to track and trace criminals and hold them to justice. As anyone in security and policing will tell you time is always key in getting the best outcome.
Committees, unlike the floor of the House, allow MPs to cross-examine witnesses with a lot more detail. The Committee system is often overlooked but the evidence we gather, like this, should help everyone make a more informed decision on all areas of public life.