The Prime Minister returned to Parliament yesterday to provide an update on her renegotiation of the Withdrawal Agreement.
This week one of our top policing and security experts stated that the deal before us will mean that we lose access to DNA databases, security alerts on terrorism and access to the European Arrest Warrant. I wanted the Prime Minister to promise a backstop insurance policy to ensure that we do not lose these important measures.
In her response she admitted her deal doesn’t cover two areas on criminal records and DNA databases. The Prime Minister stated that there will be ‘discussions’ on UK access to these in the future. I’m sorry, but to throw our national security overboard in the hope that ‘discussions’ will be fruitful in the future is reckless and puts us at risk.
The rise in retail crime over the past year is truly worrying. Our shopworkers are being put at risk and local shops are facing a the costs associated with it. Since last year, retail crime has increased from a total direct cost of £660 million to just over £700 million. This is money that is being lost due to criminals and stops employers from investing in our communities.
I have been working with the Co-Op and Usdaw – the shopworkers trade union – to raise awareness of the need for a plan to tackle this shocking rise. I asked the Leader of the House if she will give time for a debate on retail crime so that I can hold the UK Government to account for their reckless cuts to policing and security measures in our towns and villages.
No one should have to go to work in fear. I want the Government to combat this head on so we can fulfil our promise to retail staff that they have freedom from fear.
The Prime Minister returned to the House of Commons today in a hope of selling her Brexit Withdrawal Agreement.
From the very beginning of this Brexit process I have said that leaving the EU without access to EUROPOL, EUROJUST and the European Arrest Warrant will put our safety and security at risk. Indeed, the Prime Minister noted in her reply that I have often pressed her on this issue.
The Withdrawal Agreement is so thin on the ground when it comes to security arrangements that I wanted assurances that we would continue sharing security systems after we leave the EU and not merely shadow them. Without access to these databases our police and security services will be greatly undermined.
The Prime Minister pointed to the political declaration saying that we will work together to “identify the terms”. This means that there is no agreement but merely the hope of achieving something. Also, unlike the Withdrawal Agreement the political declaration is not legally binding so all words contained within it are meaningless.
The first role of government is to ensure the safety and security of its citizens. This Withdrawal Agreement fails this test.
There are many reasons for voting against the Government’s Brexit strategy but this for me is one of the biggest. That is why I will vote against the Withdrawal Agreement when it comes to Parliament in December.
An Urgent Question was granted on police funding and I wanted to see if we could get a straight answer from the minister on cuts.
We were told austerity has ended, but the Red Book – which details the Budget’s spending – stated that the Home Office will be cut by £100,000,000 next year. If the UK Government can’t say where these cuts are going to fall we must all be worried that they will hit our neighbourhood police officers the hardest.
If the Government do not properly fund our law enforcement agencies, like security services and the police, properly we will see crime continue to rise.