A cross-party Bill was introduced to Parliament on Wednesday which would allow Parliament to block a no deal Brexit once and for all. It was drafted by my friend Yvette Cooper MP and the Conservative MP Oliver Letwin MP.
I spoke of how we needed to rebuild trust between each other, both in Parliament and across the country, so that we could try and find a solution to the Brexit mess we find ourselves in. Parliament has voted, as have I, time and time again to block a No Deal Brexit this Bill merely makes it a reality.
One MP intervened on my speech to say that the European Arrest Warrant wasn’t that important because he believed that one case undermined its purpose. This is utterly wrong. As a former Minister of State for Counter-Terrorism and Policing as well as a Direct Rule Minister for Northern Ireland I can tell you that any loss of access to these vital tools would undermine our security and safety.
The division was won by a single vote – 313 to 312 and has now meant that the Bill can proceed to the House of Lords.
The Solicitor General was before the Justice Committee this week and I wanted his assurances that we would remain part of the European Arrest Warrant and EUROJUST.
The Solicitor General went as far as to admit that no deal would undermine our safety and security and how the deal before Parliament is simply an aspiration and not legally binding.
On EUROJUST the minister made it abundantly clear that we are huge beneficiaries of it. He pointed out that in 2017 the UK was involved in 82 coordination meetings, coming only second to Germany for involvement and we were involved in at least a quarter of joint investigating teams. This is a vital service that we are set to lose under current proposals.
Yet again the UK Government has evaded answering my serious concerns over national security.
During Home Office Questions, I asked the Home Secretary to explain how we will have access to important security instruments, such as EUROPOL, EUROJUST and SIS 2, if the Prime Minister’s pointless red lines on the European Court of Justice stay in place.
The Home Secretary tried to boast that this was not a problem as it was all covered in the political declaration. What he didn’t explain, however, is the political declaration is not binding. It is merely a wish list of things the UK Government want to achieve. As much as the Home Secretary might wish for these things to exist after Brexit day they won’t.
The Government need to wake up, listen to MPs concerns and change direction. Reheating the same old deal does nothing to protect our national security and does nothing to move us on from the mess this government has created.
Five days of debate has now started over the Government’s Brexit Withdrawal Agreement. This is the nearly 600 page document agreed between the UK Government and the EU nations. It is the legal basis for us leaving the EU.
Accompanying the document is a shorter ‘political declaration’. It is not legally binding and includes a wish-list of what the UK Government wants to secure in a future relationship with the EU. Neither of these documents detail how the UK will retain access to key security tools used by our police and security services.
The Home Secretary stumbled over his answer. Obviously knowing that the Government was not seeking to retain these vital tools. Let us be clear, the Government is undermining our security with their agreement and I cannot support it.